Home  |  Contact US-ECP

External Counterpulsation Effects on Clinical Outcomes, Transcranial Doppler, and Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Acute Cerebral Infarction

Authors

Si-Jun Yang, De-Xiang Gu, Zhong-Zhu Cao, Fei Li, Jiu-Lin Shi

Department of Neurology, Shanghai Second Hospital of Textile Industry Bureau, Shanghai, China

Compiled, reviewed, and organized by Dr. Guoji Gong, usecp.com


Abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy, changes in Transcranial Doppler (TCD), and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) following external counterpulsation (ECP) treatment in patients with acute cerebral infarction.

Methods: Eighty patients with acute cerebral infarction confirmed by CT were randomized into an ECP treatment group (n=40, mean age 58±9 years) and a control group (n=40, treated with Compound Danshen Injection, mean age 55±8 years). The ECP group received counterpulsation at 0.4 kg/cm2, 60 minutes/day for 14 sessions. The control group received 16 mL Compound Danshen Injection in 250 mL normal saline, intravenously once daily for 14 days. TCD and rCBF (using 133Xe inhalation) were measured before and after the treatment course. Efficacy was rated based on national reporting standards.

Results: The total effective rate (cured + marked improvement + improvement) was 87.5% in the ECP group, significantly higher than 70% in the control group (X2=5.17, P<0.05). The mean rCBF post-treatment was significantly higher in the ECP group (55.60±6.1 mL/100g/min) compared to the control group (46.60±4.0 mL/100g/min). Improvement rates in TCD and rCBF in the ECP group were significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.01). Improvement in cerebral blood flow strongly correlated with clinical improvement.

Conclusion: ECP treatment significantly improves clinical outcomes, TCD parameters, and rCBF in patients with acute cerebral infarction, suggesting its efficacy in increasing cerebral perfusion.


Methods

Study Population

A total of 80 cases of acute cerebral infarction were enrolled between October 1993 and October 1995. All cases met the diagnostic criteria approved by the National Conference on Cerebrovascular Diseases and were confirmed by cranial CT.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups:

Treatment Protocols

Both groups were supplemented with auxiliary treatments (vascular reaction and Naoxinshu treatments). Efficacy was evaluated upon completion of the treatment course.

Assessment Methods

Efficacy Evaluation

Efficacy was assessed according to national reporting standards: Cured, Marked Improvement, Improvement, or Ineffective.


Results

Clinical Efficacy

The total effective rate in the ECP treatment group (87.5%) was significantly higher than in the control group (70%).

X2=5.17, P<0.05

Table 1. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between the Two Groups

Group N Cured Marked Improvement Improvement Total Effective Rate
Treatment (ECP) 40 13 (32.5%) 14 (35%) 8 (20%) 87.5%
Control (Danshen) 40 6 (15%) 9 (22.5%) 13 (32.5%) 70%

Regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF)

The mean rCBF post-treatment was significantly higher in the ECP group (55.60±6.1 mL/100g/min) compared to the control group (46.60±4.0 mL/100g/min).

Pre-treatment rCBF: ECP group 45.70±6.0 mL/100g/min; Control group 44.70±5.0 mL/100g/min. There was a significant difference in rCBF before and after treatment in the ECP group (P<0.01).

Improvement in TCD and rCBF

Improvement rates in TCD and rCBF in the ECP group were significantly higher than in the control group, and improvement in cerebral blood flow correlated strongly with clinical improvement.

Table 2. Improvement in TCD and rCBF After Treatment in the Two Groups

Group Test Item Pre-treatment Abnormal N Improved N (%) Unimproved N (%)
Treatment (ECP) TCD 34 23 (67.7%)†† 11 (32.3%)
rCBF 36 22 (61.1%)†† 14 (38.9%)
Control (Danshen) TCD 36 15 (41.7%)†† 21 (58.3%)
rCBF 35 14 (40%)†† 21 (60%)

Note: †† P<0.01 when comparing the Treatment group with the Control group.


Discussion

External Counterpulsation (ECP) is used as an auxiliary circulatory treatment for ischemic cerebrovascular diseases, primarily by elevating aortic and cerebral arterial pressure to increase cerebral blood flow (CBF) and improve cerebral ischemia. This randomized controlled study confirms that ECP can significantly increase CBF and produce pronounced therapeutic effects, leading to a marked amelioration of neurological deficits.

The mechanism by which ECP enhances CBF is likely due to:

  1. Increased Perfusion Pressure: By elevating aortic and cerebral artery pressure during diastole, ECP improves perfusion, particularly in patients whose cerebral autoregulation is compromised by arteriosclerosis.
  2. Collateral Recruitment: ECP facilitates reperfusion of the ischemic penumbra surrounding the lesion, which is critical for functional recovery.

The results from TCD and rCBF measurements validate that ECP improves cerebral hemodynamics. ECP treatment for acute cerebral infarction demonstrates a definite therapeutic effect and warrants further research.